🔗 Share this article

Established parties in power are increasingly allowing the far right to dictate the public discourse, according to a recent research carried out in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Researchers found that this phenomenon has unwittingly helped radical groups by legitimising their ideas and spreading them to a broader audience.

Study Drawing from Over 20 Years of News Reporting

The results, published in the academic journal on political studies, relied on an automated text analysis of more than 520,000 news pieces from six national publications.

Berlin-based scholars noted that as the radical faction moved from marginal topics in the 1990s era to central themes like assimilation and migration, mainstream parties increasingly adjusted their communication in response.

This adjustment boosted the spread of these concepts and indicated to the electorate that such positions were legitimate.

Consequences for Democracy

"Public discourse by mainstream political groups plays a central role in the voting performance of the far right," stated a political sociologist involved in the research.

"This factor has been overlooked," she noted.

The impact was evident even when conventional parties were condemning the radical faction. "You're still giving them attention," the expert commented. "The main point is that because we live in such a battle for attention, this attention is key."

Mainstreaming Effect Throughout the Continent

While the research was focused on the German context, this mainstreaming phenomenon is probable to apply to nations throughout the European continent.

"You see this a lot in German and British media," said another co-author. "The far right makes a statement and everyone begins discussing it for one week."

"Even if you're opposing it, you're echoing it," he stated.

Hardening of Public Rhetoric

At times, leaders have also hardened their language to align with that of the far right.

In a recent interview, a then German chancellor advocated widespread deportations and urged them to happen "more frequently and rapidly."

Similar instances can be observed throughout the continent, as elected officials from nations including the United Kingdom to the French Republic adopt the rhetoric of the far right, particularly on immigration.

This has formed an echo chamber that was inconceivable a ten years prior.

Core Issue: Who Dictates the Agenda?

"{If you're a centrist political group and you are talking about societal topics – migration, integration – in a way that is dictated by the rhythm of the far right, that's the essence of narrative control," explained a researcher.

Other political parties have taken additional measures, seeking to copy the strict platform of the far right, despite studies suggests that this approach drives voters to cast their ballot for the far right.

Gradual Impact and Public Perception

The extent of data gathered revealed that the impact of far-right parties had been progressive and had grown with the passage of time.

"Public perception doesn't change from day to day," stated a co-author. "However, when you hear this negative framing around immigration frequently, and it is being disseminated not only by radical groups but also, for example, by established political organizations, then of course this narrative travels further."

Requirement for Established Parties to Carve Out Their Own Discourses

The research emphasized the necessity for established political parties to carve out their distinct discourses, especially on subjects such as migration and integration, instead of continuously trailing after the far right.

"It's like a dance," said one researcher. "When the leader is far-right and you're reacting to it, you lose the ability to choose which music should be heard."